Decision Support System For Employee Bonus Allocation At PT. Pesta Pora Abadi Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT)

Penulis

Kata Kunci:

Decision support system, Employee bonus, Employee performance, Multi-attribute utility theory, Sensitivity analysis

Abstrak

Employee bonus allocation is a recurring human-resource decision in which multiple performance dimensions must be considered simultaneously. At PT. Pesta Pora Abadi, the existing process relies substantially on manual recapitulation and managerial judgment, creating risks of inconsistent weighting, limited auditability, and avoidable calculation errors. This study develops a desktop-based Decision Support System (DSS) using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to structure employee bonus decisions across five criteria: discipline, work quality, responsibility, teamwork, and absenteeism. The research combines observation, interviews, literature analysis, requirements engineering, Unified Modeling Language (UML)-based system design, MAUT implementation, and black-box functional testing. MAUT converts heterogeneous criterion values into a common 0–100 utility scale and aggregates them using criterion weights that sum to one. Using an illustrative dataset of five employees, the model produced aggregate utilities of 79.67, 61.46, 61.28, 41.56, and 10.50, with Citra Ayu ranked first. A one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis with ±10% and ±20% perturbations of each criterion weight showed that the first-ranked and last-ranked alternatives remained stable across all scenarios, although the second and third positions were sensitive to modest changes in several weights. The findings indicate that the proposed DSS can make bonus calculations more explicit, reproducible, and traceable while also revealing where managerial weight choices materially affect middle-rank alternatives. The study therefore contributes not only an operational MAUT implementation but also a robustness-oriented interpretation that is relevant to transparent human-resource decision support.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

[1] E. Turban, R. Sharda, and D. Delen, Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems, 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Education, 2011.

[2] Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi Offset, 2007.

[3] P. C. Fishburn, “Methods of estimating additive utilities,” Management Science, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 435–453, 1967.

[4] J. Wallenius, J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, S. Zionts, and K. Deb, “Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead,” Management Science, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1336–1349, 2008, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0838.

[5] M. Cinelli, M. Kadziński, M. Gonzalez, and R. Słowiński, “How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy,” Omega, vol. 96, Art. no. 102261, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261.

[6] F. E. Khair, S. Defit, and Y. Yuhandri, “Sistem keputusan dengan metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory dalam penilaian kinerja pegawai,” Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 215–220, 2021, doi: 10.37034/jidt.v3i4.155.

[7] K. Neti, “The implementation of Multi Attribute Utility Theory method for employee performance appraisal in the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kemenkumham) of Bengkulu Province,” Jurnal Komputer, Informasi dan Teknologi, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 252–262, 2021, doi: 10.53697/jkomitek.v1i2.222.

[8] S. Kayati, Junadhi, H. Yenni, and H. Asnal, “Penerapan metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) pada sistem pendukung keputusan dalam menentukan kelas unggulan di SMKN 1 Mandau,” Teknologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 39–46, 2022, doi: 10.26594/teknologi.v12i2.3282.

[9] M. I. Fikri, E. Haerani, I. Afrianty, and S. Ramadhani, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penilaian kinerja guru menggunakan metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer), vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1271–1280, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i5.4791.

[10] B. Maitasari and A. Farisi, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan karyawan terbaik menggunakan metode MAUT,” SATESI: Jurnal Sains Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2024, doi: 10.54259/satesi.v4i1.2554.

[11] A. Theo, I. S. Wijaya, and E. Suratno, “Perancangan sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian bonus karyawan pada PT. Lingga Harapan Jambi menggunakan metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT),” Media Informatika, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2023, doi: 10.37595/mediainfo.v22i1.167.

[12] N. A. Wulandari, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian reward tahunan untuk guru SMKN 1 Muara Labuh memanfaatkan pendekatan MAUT (Multi Attribute Utility Theory),” Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 374–380, 2024, doi: 10.59435/gjmi.v2i8.857.

[13] Zulfikar and U. Chotijah, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penilaian kinerja karyawan menggunakan metode AHP dan MAUT,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen (JURSIMA), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 185–194, 2022, doi: 10.47024/js.v10i1.405.

[14] S. Andriani and A. Meiriza, “Penerapan metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique pada pemberian bonus tahunan karyawan,” Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 666–681, 2021, doi: 10.28932/jutisi.v7i3.4079.

[15] J. Felicia, Hugeng, and T. Sutrisno, “Sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian bonus kepada karyawan berbasis web,” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 11, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.24912/jiksi.v11i1.24102.

[16] S. Sofyan, S. N. Asia, and M. I. Quraisy, “Perancangan sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan bonus karyawan berbasis web menggunakan metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Jurnal Sains Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 11–16, 2022, doi: 10.33084/jsakti.v4i2.3327.

[17] Z. Mahmudiyah, Y. Yanitasari, and Supriyadi, “Analisis implementasi Multi-Attribute Border Approximation Area Comparison pada sistem pendukung keputusan pemberian bonus karyawan,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2024, doi: 10.21456/vol14iss1pp20-28.

[18] A. P. Sumarno, M. Setiawan, S. Aisjah, and Sunaryo, “Employees performance evaluation in Defense Ministry of the Republic of Indonesia based on multicriteria decision making (MCDM) and system dynamic (SD),” International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 245–266, 2021, doi: 10.46970/2021.27.3.4.

[19] B. Derebew, S. Thota, P. Shanmugasundaram, and T. Asfetsami, “Fuzzy logic decision support system for hospital employee performance evaluation with Maple implementation,” Arab Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2021, doi: 10.1080/25765299.2021.1890909.

[20] J. S. Dyer, “MAUT—Multiattribute utility theory,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2005, pp. 265–292, doi: 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_7.

Diterbitkan

2026-09-30

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

Decision Support System For Employee Bonus Allocation At PT. Pesta Pora Abadi Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). (2026). Innovative Journal of Computing Research (IJCR), 2(1). https://jjrip.org/ijcr/article/view/27

Artikel Serupa

1-10 dari 11

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.